Skip to main content
· 12/16/1983

Intermountain Systems, Inc. v. Edsall Construction Co.

Citations

  • 575 F. Supp. 1195
  • 1983 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 10688

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • finding the clause “It is agreed for purposes of this agreement, venue shall be in Adams County, Colorado.” to be mandatory
  • “[T]o include the federal district court for the district of Colorado within the ambit of Adams County, Colorado would be a severe catachresis.”
  • “venue shall be in Adams County, Colorado”
  • “venue shall be in Adams County, Colorado”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Kane

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.