Skip to main content
· 8/31/2001

Intermountain Forest Management, Inc. v. LOUISIANA-PACIFIC CORP.

Citations

  • 31 P.3d 921
  • 136 Idaho 233
  • 2001 Ida. LEXIS 102

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that an important element in finding the intent necessary to form a contract is “whether the negotiations indicate that a written draft is contemplated as the final conclusion of negotiations”
  • upholding fees where district court’s grant of summary judgment was upheld on appeal
  • upholding fees where district court’s grant of summary judgment was upheld on appeal
  • no operative offer when parties had reason to know that further manifestation of assent was necessary
  • no operative offer when parties had reason to know that further manifestation of assent was necessary

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Eismann, Kidwell, Schroeder, Trout, Walters

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.