· 10/22/1986
Intermedics Infusaid, Inc. And the Infusaid Company v. The Regents of the University of Minnesota
Citations
- 804 F.2d 129
- 231 U.S.P.Q. (BNA) 653
- 1986 U.S. App. LEXIS 20375
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- “Whether an appellate court exercises this ‘doctrine of pendent jurisdiction at the appellate level’ is a matter of discretion.”
- “The circuits have uniformly focused on the policy of judicial economy in deciding whether to review pendent orders and issues.”
- “Because we have jurisdiction to review the effective denial of [appellant’s motion for a preliminary injunction, we also have jurisdiction over the trial court’s decision to stay this case pending ... proceedings before the PTO.”
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Baldwin, Nies, Archer
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.