Interior Trails Preservation Coalition v. Swope

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• “[T]he focus in a prescriptive easement claim is on ‘use,’ whereas the focus in an adverse possession case is on ‘possession.’”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

3 cases in this archive cite this case.

• Dickson v. State, Dept. of Natural Resources
  Alaska Supreme Court· 2018-10-05· cited 5×
• London & Stetelman Inc., L & D, LLC, and Andrew D. Stetelman v. Nelson Tackett and Judy Tackett, Both Individually and as Co-Trustees of the Nelson and Judy Tackett Joint Revocable Trust, and Subway Sandwich Shops of Hattiesburg, Inc
  Court of Appeals of Mississippi· 2020-11-24
• Kelly A. Dickson, Trustee of the Kelly A. Dickson 2008 Trust, and Donna C. Defusco v. State of Alaska, Department of Natural Resources , and also all other persons or parties unknown claiming a right, title, estate, lien, or interest in the real estate described in this action
  Alaska Supreme Court· 2021-05-28

Cites

10 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• Brimstone Mining, Inc. v. Glaus
  Montana Supreme Court· 2003-09-09· cited 42×
• McGill v. Wahl
  Alaska Supreme Court· 1992-09-18· cited 38×
• Alaskans for a Common Language, Inc. v. Kritz
  Alaska Supreme Court· 2000-06-16· cited 32×
• Price v. Eastham
  Alaska Supreme Court· 2003-08-15· cited 31×
• Alaska National Bank v. Linck
  Alaska Supreme Court· 1977-02-07· cited 29×
• Dillingham Commercial Co. v. City of Dillingham
  Alaska Supreme Court· 1985-08-16· cited 23×
• McDonald v. Harris
  Alaska Supreme Court· 1999-04-09· cited 10×
• Williams v. Harrsch
  Oregon Supreme Court· 1984-04-24· cited 10×
• Southeastern Pennsylvania Transportation Authority v. Pennsylvania Public Utility Commission
  Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania· 1986-03-04· cited 10×
• Elmer v. Rodgers
  Supreme Court of New Hampshire· 1965-12-07· cited 7×