Interior Glass Services, Inc. v. Federal Deposit Insurance

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• “prior knowledge of a case in which [the FDIC] may or should become a party cannot suffice” to trigger the thirty day period
• FDIC not “party” under Alaska law until state court granted motion for substitution
• 30-day clock of removal statute started to run when FDIC substituted as party
• FDIC was not a party to action until state court exercised its discretion to grant motion to substitute FDIC as a party defendant and it was not until that date that 30-day motion for filing removal petition began to run
• lawyer’s letter is not an “other paper”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).