Skip to main content
· 2/18/2005

Federal Case

Citations

  • 399 F.3d 248
  • 35 Envtl. L. Rep. (Envtl. Law Inst.) 20043
  • 59 ERC (BNA) 2116
  • 2005 U.S. App. LEXIS 2911

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding liability under RCRA for contamination to groundwater and rivers because the ISE provision “imposes liability for endanger-ments to the environment, including water in and of itself’
  • holding a court may grant relief “as necessary” to abate endangerment, regardless of state standards
  • holding a court may grant relief “as necessary” to abate endangerment, regardless of state standards
  • stating that Parker’s “approach . . . is most faithful to the statutory language, 23 especially as to the word ‘substantial’”
  • noting that an injury in fact must be “concrete” rather than “conjectural or hypothetical” (citations omitted
  • finding that a suit to clean up a former chemical plant was germane to the purpose of an organization committed to “improv[ing] . . . the quality of life” of the citizens of the county

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.