· 2/18/2005
Federal Case
Citations
- 399 F.3d 248
- 35 Envtl. L. Rep. (Envtl. Law Inst.) 20043
- 59 ERC (BNA) 2116
- 2005 U.S. App. LEXIS 2911
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- holding liability under RCRA for contamination to groundwater and rivers because the ISE provision “imposes liability for endanger-ments to the environment, including water in and of itself’
- holding a court may grant relief “as necessary” to abate endangerment, regardless of state standards
- holding a court may grant relief “as necessary” to abate endangerment, regardless of state standards
- stating that Parker’s “approach . . . is most faithful to the statutory language, 23 especially as to the word ‘substantial’”
- noting that an injury in fact must be “concrete” rather than “conjectural or hypothetical” (citations omitted
- finding that a suit to clean up a former chemical plant was germane to the purpose of an organization committed to “improv[ing] . . . the quality of life” of the citizens of the county
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.