Skip to main content
· 1/10/2013

Interface Kanner, LLC v. JP Morgan CHase Bank, N.A.

Citations

  • 704 F.3d 927
  • 2013 WL 104984
  • 2013 U.S. App. LEXIS 715

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • remanding to district court for dismissal of action upon finding jurisdiction lacking due to failure to exhaust FIRREA administrative remedies
  • remanding to district court for dismissal of action upon finding jurisdiction lacking due to failure to exhaust FIRREA administrative remedies
  • “We … find that the P & A Agreement does not provide a ‘clear intent’ to benefit” the plaintiff
  • “While FIRREA does not provide an explicit mandate for exhaustion of administrative remedies, its provisions are accepted by the cases and by Congress as having that meaning.”
  • “for post-receivership claims — such as [Federated’s] potential claim[s] against the FDIC — the court has ‘no subject matter jurisdiction unless the claimant has exhausted the administrative remedies’”
  • “While FIRREA does not provide an explicit mandate for exhaustion of administrative remedies, its provisions are accepted by the cases and by Congress as having that meaning.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Dubina, Pryor, Anderson

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.