· 1/10/2013
Interface Kanner, LLC v. JP Morgan CHase Bank, N.A.
Citations
- 704 F.3d 927
- 2013 WL 104984
- 2013 U.S. App. LEXIS 715
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- remanding to district court for dismissal of action upon finding jurisdiction lacking due to failure to exhaust FIRREA administrative remedies
- remanding to district court for dismissal of action upon finding jurisdiction lacking due to failure to exhaust FIRREA administrative remedies
- “We … find that the P & A Agreement does not provide a ‘clear intent’ to benefit” the plaintiff
- “While FIRREA does not provide an explicit mandate for exhaustion of administrative remedies, its provisions are accepted by the cases and by Congress as having that meaning.”
- “for post-receivership claims — such as [Federated’s] potential claim[s] against the FDIC — the court has ‘no subject matter jurisdiction unless the claimant has exhausted the administrative remedies’”
- “While FIRREA does not provide an explicit mandate for exhaustion of administrative remedies, its provisions are accepted by the cases and by Congress as having that meaning.”
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Dubina, Pryor, Anderson
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.