Interest of A.Z.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that the prohibition against review does not extend to remand orders entered on grounds not provided by section 1447
• holding that a remand order based on the district court’s crowded docket is reviewable by writ of mandamus
• ruling that an appellate court could review an order remanding a case because the district court’s heavy docket would unjustly delay trial on the merits
• holding that § 1447(d) precludes review only of those remand orders issued pursuant to § 1447(c)
• holding that a remand order issued pursuant to Section 1447(c) is not reviewable “whether erroneous or not and whether review is sought by appeal or by extraordinary writ.”
• holding that because the district court judge exceeded his statutorily defined power in remanding a properly removed case, § 1447(d

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).