Interdigital Communications Corp. v. Nokia Corp.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• noting plaintiff \is seeking damages' for lost opportunity costs in the form of prejudgment interest\
• noting plaintiff “is seeking damages for lost opportunity costs in the form of prejudgment interest”
• “This action presents the all too common denouement of international arbitrations— relitigation in federal court.”
• “It is hornbook law that a contract should be interpreted so as not to render its terms nonsensical”
• where party seeking vacatur cannot “draw[] this Court’s attention to [a] principle of law—let alone willful circumnavigation of that principle by the [p]anel,” vacatur is not warranted
• “[E]ven when a portion of an arbitral decision is ambiguous or confusing, [courts] need only find that the award is not ‘inexplicable’ in order to deny vacatur.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).