Skip to main content
· 12/28/1994

Intercontinental Travel Marketing, Inc. v. Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation, as Receiver for Gateway National Bank

Citations

  • 45 F.3d 1278
  • 94 Daily Journal DAR 18162
  • 94 Cal. Daily Op. Serv. 9762
  • 1994 U.S. App. LEXIS 36449

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that compliance with FIRREA’s exhaustion requirement was mandatory for both pre- and post-receivership claims
  • concluding that FDIC’s failure to comply with mandatory statutory requirement of mailing a notice, when the failure was merely negligent, did not justify precluding the agency from further action
  • holding that the district court lacks jurisdiction to consider claims against a failed financial institution unless they are first brought before the FDIC
  • concluding that FDIC’s failure to comply -8- with mandatory statutory requirement of mailing a notice, when the failure was merely negligent, did not justify precluding the agency from further action
  • concluding that FIRREA’s claims bar date is a jurisdictional requirement
  • explaining that waiver and estoppel doctrines do not apply to subject matter jurisdiction

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Wiggins, Brunetti

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.