Intercontinental Terminals Co. v. Vopak North America, Inc.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that we view evidence submitted to trial court in light most favorable to court’s ruling, draw all legitimate-inferences from evidence, and defer to trial court’s resolution of conflicting evidence
• stating that “[t]he evidence must be sufficient to raise ‘a bona fide issue [] as to [the applicant’s] right to ultimate relief.’ ”
• recognizing that the trial court could credit testimony that calculating the financial loss of reputation and goodwill would be very difficult and affirming its finding that “the threatened injury [to the claimant] could not be adequately remedied at law”
• observing that this requirement incorporates the concept of lacking an “adequate remedy at law,” “one that is as complete, practical, and efficient to the prompt administration of justice as is equitable relief”
• evidence that defendant’s actions were causing loss of goodwill and reputation was evidence of imminent actual injury
• to show probable right to relief, applicant must adduce evidence sufficient to raise a bona fide issue as to applicant’s right to ultimate relief

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).