Intercontinental Enterprises, Inc. v. Keller (In Re Blinder, Robinson & Co.)

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• noting that Hawley Coal, Scaccia, and Johns-Manville all failed to engage the jurisdictional question
• indicating that creditor/trustee distinction is not proper
• “[T]his appeal involves the discrete issue of the Trustee’s entitlement to closed Rule 2004 examinations, and the bankruptcy court’s order appears to have fully resolved the parties’ dispute.”
• “Many courts recognize that Rule 2004 in effect authorizes a ‘fishing expedition,’ and ‘is essentially creditor and trustee oriented.’”
• “Many courts recognize that Rule 2004 in effect authorizes a ‘fishing expedition,’ and ‘is essentially creditor and trustee oriented.’”
• “Entities not affected by the adversary proceeding do not require the greater protections afforded under the Federal Rules, and the Trustee should be permitted to examine them under Rule 2004”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).