Interbank Investments, LLC v. Eagle River Water & Sanitation District

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that “a party can recover on a quasi-contract when the party will have no right under an enforceable contract.”
• explaining that claims for quantum meruit or unjust enrichment cannot lie where an express contract covers the payment obligations
• explaining that claims for quantum meruit or unjust enrichment cannot lie where an express contract covers the payment obligations
• noting that a party can recover on quasi-contract when (1) the implied-in-law contract covered conduct outside the express contract or matters arising subsequent to the express contract or (2) if the express contract failed or was rescinded
• explaining “a party can recover on a quasi-contract when the implied-in-law contract covers conduct outside the express contract or matters arising subsequent to the express contract”
• Dismissing unjust 3 enrichment claim where “enforceable express contracts cover the same subject matter”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).