Interactive Products Corporation v. A2z Mobile Office Solutions, Inc., Brian Lee, Mobile Office Enterprise, and Douglas Mayer

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that the post-domain path of a URL does not typically signify source
• explaining that “a claim for trademark dilution . . . does not require a showing of likelihood of confusion
• “Because post-domain paths do not typically signify source, it is unlikely 23 24 1 that the presence of another’s trademark in a post-domain path of a URL would ever violate trademark law.”
• “claims for trademark infringement and false designation of origin under the Ohio Deceptive Trade Practices Act and Ohio common law are subject to the same ‘likelihood of confusion’ standards as their federal counterparts”
• “[M]ere puffery . . . is not actionable under the Lan- ham Act.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).