Intellectual Tech LLC v. Zebra Technologies Corporation

Oral argument

• Argued

  33 min recording
  Listen

Source: CourtListener oral-argument corpus (CC0).

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that a police chief was not entitled to qualified immunity although he was not “actively involved in the incidents” at issue
• holding that a sheriff’s “indifference to maintaining a properly functioning K-9 unit could be reasonably expected to give rise to just the sort of injuries that occurred”
• finding that ten incidents over an eighteen year period do not demonstrate a pattern of constitutional violations that satisfies the burden of proving deliberate indifference
• stating that the plaintiff who made eye contact with the officer while lying on the ground before being bitten by a canine “made out a colorable argument for excessive force based upon [the officer’s] improper handling [of the dog].”
• upholding denial of summary judgment on plaintiff’s excessive force and state-law assault and battery claims based on police K-9 bites
• holding AT&T’s submission of its tariff rates to FCC for publication—that FCC did not need to review or approve prior to publication—did not warrant Noerr-Pennington immunity because decision to impose and maintain the interface tariff was made in the AT&T boardroom, not at the FCC

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).