Intellectual Property Development, Inc. And Communications Patents, Ltd. v. Ua-Columbia Cablevision of Westchester, Inc. And Tele-Communications, Inc.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• “[W]e see no reason why, as a matter of law, one claim limitation may not be responsive to another merely because they are located in the same physical structure.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).