Intellect Wireless, Inc. v. HTC Corporation

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• explaining that an \unmistakably false\ declaration \alone establishes materiality\ if not cured
• finding deceitful conduct as to related patents helped establish inequitable conduct with respect to asserted patents
• finding that it “no clear error” in a district court’s finding of intent to deceive based on a consideration both the alleged misrepresentations made during the prosecution of the patent at issue as well a “pattern of false and misleading statements during prosecution of related patents”
• “We note that Therasense in no way modified [the holding] that the materiality prong of inequitable conduct is met when an applicant files a false affidavit and fails to cure the misconduct.”
• “The original declaration contains multiple unmistak ably false statements”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).