· 12/24/1991
Intel Corporation v. Hartford Accident & Indemnity Company
Citations
- 952 F.2d 1551
- 22 Envtl. L. Rep. (Envtl. Law Inst.) 20968
- 91 Daily Journal DAR 15971
- 91 Cal. Daily Op. Serv. 10061
- 35 ERC (BNA) 1216
- 1991 U.S. App. LEXIS 29817
- 1991 WL 271366
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- California waiver doctrine \make[s] clear the rationale of protecting insureds and providing incentives for insurers to proceed properly.\
- despite broadly worded summary judgment motion involving issues not fully briefed by the parties, summary judgment was not \awarded precipitously\
- the party opposing summary 6 7 judgment must present sufficient evidence to support his claim
- Waiver occurs when “a party intentionally relinquishes a right, or when that party’s acts are so inconsistent with an intent to enforce the right as to induce a reasonable belief that such right has been relinquished.”
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Lively, Fletcher, Reinhardt
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.