Skip to main content
· 8/4/1988

Intel Corp. v. Hartford Acc. and Indem. Co.

Citations

  • 692 F. Supp. 1171
  • 19 Envtl. L. Rep. (Envtl. Law Inst.) 20459
  • 28 ERC (BNA) 1538
  • 1988 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 8582
  • 1988 WL 81130

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • “The clear bulk of authority has held that cleanup costs are damages within the scope of CGL policy coverage.”
  • no reference to Maryland law in Mraz opinion

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Aguilar

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.