Integrative Nutrition, Inc. v. Academy of Healing Nutrition

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• concluding that “plaintiff’s unfair competition claim [was] predicated on a theory of reverse passing off” and was preempted by the Copyright Act where the “primary allegation” was that “the defendants [had] plagiarized the plaintiff’s website”
• “The Copyright Act preempts unfair competition and misappropriation claims ‘grounded solely in the copying of a plaintiff’s protected expression.’”
• “The Copyright Act preempts unfair competition and misappropriation claims ‘grounded solely in the copying of a plaintiff’s protected expression.’”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).