Integrated Systems & Power, Inc. v. Honeywell International, Inc.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• “While Plaintiff repeatedly asserts that Defendant’s conduct constitutes a ‘horizontal conspiracy,’ . . . this characterization is a legal conclusion that the Court does not accept as true on a motion to dismiss.”
• “While Plaintiff repeatedly asserts that Defendant’s conduct constitutes a ‘horizontal conspiracy,’ and therefore is a per se violation, this characterization is a legal conclusion that the Court does not accept as true on a motion to dismiss.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).