· 6/6/1991
Integon Life Insurance v. Mableton-Booper Associates (In Re Mableton-Booper Associates)
Citations
- 127 B.R. 941
- 1991 Bankr. LEXIS 780
- 21 Bankr. Ct. Dec. (CRR) 1290
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- reasoning that Section 1141’s finality “allow[s] parties to rely on the provisions of a confirmed reorganization plan”
- reasoning that Section 1141 imposes an “important element of finality in Chapter 11 proceedings, allowing parties to rely on the provisions of a confirmed reorganization plan.”
- requiring a showing of \unanticipated changed circumstances\ to justify the filing of a successive petition
- requiring a showing of “unanticipated changed circumstances” to justify the filing of a successive petition
- ‘Where unexpected circumstances doom the debtor’s chances for success, binding the parties to the original confirmation decision in the name of finality would frustrate [the goal of reorganization], and the confirmation decision should be reevaluated.”
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Drake
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.