Intalco Aluminum Corporation v. National Labor Relations Board, and International Association of MacHinists and Aerospace Workers, Afl-Cio, Intervenor

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• acknowledging that in Virginia Electric, the Supreme Court found that it “need not examine the various situations in those cases ‘or consider hypothetical possibilities’” (quoting Va. Elec., 319 U.S. at 545)
• acknowledging that in Virginia Electric, the Supreme Court found that it “need not examine the various situations in those cases ‘or consider hypothetical possibilities’” (quoting Va. Elec., 319 U.S. at 545)
• “we conclude that under the circumstances of this case, the provisions for dues reimbursement is in fact a penalty and can not fairly be said ‘to effectuate the purposes of the Act’ ”
• “we conclude that under the circumstances of this case, the provisions for dues reimbursement is in fact a penalty and can not fairly be said ‘to effectuate the purposes of the Act’”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).