Insurance Industry Consultants, LLC v. Alford

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that there was evidence from which the jury could conclude the defendant was stubbornly litigious and acted in bad faith by “refusing to pay [the plaintiff] monies to which he was legally entitled to under the contract”
• “As long as there is some evidence to support the verdict, the denial of defendant’s motion for directed verdict, new trial and [JNOV] will not be disturbed.”
• no usurpation when clients prospective or had to annually renew contracts

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).