Insurance Company of North America v. G.I. Trucking Company

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• finding that a shipper’s claim was sufficient even though no amount of damage was specified
• stating that “[o]ther circuits ... have held that a claim must specify an amount of damages to be considered legally sufficient under the regulations.... We expressly reject this conclusion.”
• stating that the 8 regulations “outline the minimum requirements of a written notice claim under the UBL”
• explaining that “the form of the written notice is less important than its adequacy in apprising the carrier of the basis for the claim and the fact that reimbursement will be sought.”
• stating that “[o]ther circuits ... have held that a claim must specify an amount of damages to be considered legally sufficient under the regulations. ... We expressly reject this conclusion.”
• explaining that “the form of the written notice is less important than its adequacy in apprising the carrier of the basis for the claim and the fact that reimbursement will be sought.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).