Skip to main content
· 8/31/1988

Insurance Commissioner v. Property & Casualty Insurance

Citations

  • 546 A.2d 458
  • 313 Md. 518
  • 1988 Md. LEXIS 121

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding only “insureds” to be claimants for purposes of Maryland’s non-duplication provision
  • holding that only insureds are claimants
  • holding that only insureds are claimants
  • recovery from a solvent insurer of a claim different than the one against the insolvent insurer is not a “windfall” prohibited by the nonduplication provision

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Murphy

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.