· 12/8/1980
Insurance Co. v. A. J. Zinda Co.
Citations
- 49 Or. App. 589
- 620 P.2d 504
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- summary judgment proper where speculation would be required to prove element of cause of action alleged
- the existence of a fact cannot be inferred when a contrary fact could be inferred with equal certainty from the same evidence
- the existence of a fact cannot be inferred when a contrary fact could be inferred with equal certainty from the same evidence
- summary judgment proper where speculation would be required to prove element of cause of action alleged
- summary judgment proper where speculation would be necessary to prove element of cause of action alleged
- drunk driver was effective intervening cause breaking any causal chain between alleged defects in intersection and resulting injuries
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Buttler, Richardson, Thornton
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.