· 11/5/1982
Insurance Co. of North America v. Coffman
Citations
- 451 A.2d 952
- 52 Md. App. 732
- 1982 Md. App. LEXIS 367
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- observing that defenses founded on a lack of basic coverage “may not be waived merely by the company’s failure to specify them in its initial response to the claim, for the effect of that would be to expand the policy to create a risk not intended to be undertaken by the company”
- after denying coverage under policy definition, insurer may later rely on exclusion
- defenses founded upon lack of basic coverage may not be waived merely by the company’s failure to specify them in its initial response to the claim, for the effect of that would be to expand the policy to create a risk not intended to be undertaken by the company
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Wilner, Garrity, Adkins
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.