Skip to main content
· 11/5/1982

Insurance Co. of North America v. Coffman

Citations

  • 451 A.2d 952
  • 52 Md. App. 732
  • 1982 Md. App. LEXIS 367

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • observing that defenses founded on a lack of basic coverage “may not be waived merely by the company’s failure to specify them in its initial response to the claim, for the effect of that would be to expand the policy to create a risk not intended to be undertaken by the company”
  • after denying coverage under policy definition, insurer may later rely on exclusion
  • defenses founded upon lack of basic coverage may not be waived merely by the company’s failure to specify them in its initial response to the claim, for the effect of that would be to expand the policy to create a risk not intended to be undertaken by the company

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Wilner, Garrity, Adkins

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.