Skip to main content
· 8/9/2000

Insurance Co. of Evanston v. Bowers

Citations

  • 758 A.2d 213
  • 2000 Pa. Super. 230
  • 2000 Pa. Super. LEXIS 2015

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that the ward of a rehabilitation center was not “family” as defined by the center’s insurance policy and thus not entitled to stacked UIM coverage after being struck by a vehicle
  • holding that the ward of a rehabilitation center was not “family” as defined by the center’s insurance policy and thus not entitled to stacked UIM coverage after being struck by a vehicle
  • stating that insurance policy must be read in entirety and intent of policy is gathered from consideration of entire instrument
  • finding similarly worded “family member” language in a business auto poli- ey inapplicable where the insured is not an individual
  • minor bicyclist in treatment corporation’s custody as a delinquent juvenile was not an insured under corporate policy’s definition of that term

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Sole, Melvin, Beck

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.