Insite Vision Incorporated v. Sandoz, Inc.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• \Defining the problem in terms of its solution reveals improper hindsight in the selection of the prior art relevant to obviousness.\
• “Whether a person of ordinary skill in the art would narrow the research focus to lead to the invention depends on the facts.”
• “[T]he dis- trict court was correct to at least question the relevance and probative value of the [European Patent Office] file history under United States law.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).