Skip to main content
· 2/28/2024

Insight Terminal Solutions, LL v. Cecelia Fin. Management, LLC

Oral argument

Source: CourtListener oral-argument corpus (CC0).

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • noting two additional problems with shackling a defendant: shackles “may confuse and embarrass the defendant, thereby impairing his mental faculties” and they may cause the defendant pain
  • the trial court abused its discretion in permitting the painful shackling of defendant’s hands for 17 months because it should have considered the alternative of excluding the defendant from the courtroom for periods of time
  • relief warranted where trial court abused its discretion in permitting the painful shackling of defendant’s hands for 17 months because the court should have considered the alternative of excluding the defendant from the courtroom for periods of time
  • relief warranted where trial court abused its discretion in permitting the painful shackling of defendant’s hands for 17 months because the court should have considered the alternative of excluding the defendant from the courtroom for periods of time

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.