· 2/28/2024
Insight Terminal Solutions, LL v. Cecelia Fin. Management, LLC
Oral argument
- ListenArgued34 min recording
Source: CourtListener oral-argument corpus (CC0).
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- noting two additional problems with shackling a defendant: shackles “may confuse and embarrass the defendant, thereby impairing his mental faculties” and they may cause the defendant pain
- the trial court abused its discretion in permitting the painful shackling of defendant’s hands for 17 months because it should have considered the alternative of excluding the defendant from the courtroom for periods of time
- relief warranted where trial court abused its discretion in permitting the painful shackling of defendant’s hands for 17 months because the court should have considered the alternative of excluding the defendant from the courtroom for periods of time
- relief warranted where trial court abused its discretion in permitting the painful shackling of defendant’s hands for 17 months because the court should have considered the alternative of excluding the defendant from the courtroom for periods of time
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.