Insight Systems Corp., and Centerscope Technologies, Inc. v. the United States 12-863c and

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that the “Government Control exception does not exclude from its coverage electronic communications” because “a server controlled by the government most certainly can be an ‘installation’ that receives electronic submissions”
• highlighting “[t]he relevant inquiry in weighing this factor is whether plaintiff has an adequate remedy in the absence of an injunction”
• highlighting “[t]he relevant inquiry in weighing this factor is whether plaintiff has an adequate remedy in the 21 absence of an injunction”
• highlighting “[t]he relevant inquiry in weighing this factor is whether plaintiff has an adequate remedy in the 21 absence of an injunction”
• in discussing government’s “receipt” of electronic communications, comparing “government computer server” to “a clerk in a government mail room”
• “The UETA, which has been adopted in almost every state, holds that an electronic document is received when it enters the recipient’s computer system.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).