Skip to main content
· 10/19/2001

Inscho v. Exide Corp.

Citations

  • 33 P.3d 249
  • 29 Kan. App. 2d 892
  • 17 I.E.R. Cas. (BNA) 1802
  • 2001 Kan. App. LEXIS 1000

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • concluding that employer “did not act arbitrarily or without just cause in terminating” the plaintiff for pulling another employee’s hair

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Marquardt, Gernon, Brazil

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.