· 10/19/2001
Inscho v. Exide Corp.
Citations
- 33 P.3d 249
- 29 Kan. App. 2d 892
- 17 I.E.R. Cas. (BNA) 1802
- 2001 Kan. App. LEXIS 1000
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- concluding that employer “did not act arbitrarily or without just cause in terminating” the plaintiff for pulling another employee’s hair
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Marquardt, Gernon, Brazil
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.