INS. CO. OF STATE OF PENNSYLVANIA v. Orosco

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that the workers’ compensation claimant was the prevailing party under section 408.221(c) because he obtained a dismissal of the insurance company's workers’ compensation appeal based on lack of standing
• holding that the workers’ compensation claimant was the prevailing party under section 408.221(c) because he obtained a dismissal of the insurance company’s workers’ compensation appeal based on lack of standing
• holding that the workers = compensation claimant was the prevailing party under section 408.221(c) because he obtained a dismissal of the insurance company = s workers = compensation appeal based on lack of standing
• noting that the “plain language of section 410.258(f) prohibits the trial court from rendering a judgment that does not comply with section 410.258”
• holding party obtaining dismissal of claim against it is a prevailing party
• the possibility of a future loss is not an actual and immediate loss

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).