· 5/23/1983
Inryco, Inc. v. Metropolitan Engineering Company, Inc., and American Fidelity Fire Insurance Company
Citations
- 708 F.2d 1225
- 36 Fed. R. Serv. 2d 795
- 1983 U.S. App. LEXIS 27454
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- defendant’s counsel “showed a callous disregard for the procedures of this circuit”
- remedy for attorney failure lies in malpractice suit not Rule 60(B) motion
- “The defendants here were not diligent in pursuing this case and therefore would not prevail even if gross negligence qualified as another Rule 60(b) ground for relief, because courts allowing such relief uniformly require a diligent, conscientious client.”
- addressing these considerations in context of default judgment
- attorney's conduct not excusable neglect
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Bauer, Coffey, Holder
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.