Skip to main content
· 9/23/2003

Inrecon, LLC v. Highlands Insurance

Citations

  • 284 F. Supp. 2d 773

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • jointly considering the priority of filing and relative progress factors, and holding that because the state case was at “essentially the same point” as the federal case, “this factor weighs against granting abstention, not for it”
  • “The appropriate consideration is whether the two cases are currently parallel, not whether one could be modified so as to make the cases identical” and a case is not parallel when the claims allege entirely different causes of action

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Rosen

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.