Inre: Roslin Institute (Edinburgh)

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• affirming finding of ineligibility because “Dolly’s” genetic identity to her donor parent rendered her unpatentable and “any difference in mitochondrial DNA between the donor and cloned mammals is ... unclaimed”
• “Section 101 patent eligibility is a question of law[-.]”
• “Section 101 patent eligibility is a question of law[.]”
• “Section 101 patent eligibility is a question of law”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).