Skip to main content
· 10/18/2013

Inre: Biedermann

Citations

  • 733 F.3d 329
  • 108 U.S.P.Q. 2d (BNA) 1623
  • 2013 WL 5663429
  • 2013 U.S. App. LEXIS 21112

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • “A new ground of rejection is not negated by the fact that the Board is responding to an appellant’s argument.”
  • “A new ground of rejection, however, generally will not be found based on the Board ‘further explain[ing] the Exam- iner’s rejection’ or the Board’s thoroughness in responding to an applicant’s argument.” (alteration in original

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Moore, Linn, O'Malley

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.