· 7/24/2015

Inova Health System v. National Labor Relations Board

Citations

417 App. D.C. 331
795 F.3d 68
417 U.S. App. D.C. 331
203 L.R.R.M. (BNA) 3550
2015 U.S. App. LEXIS 12786

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

“Thus, circumstantial, but substantial, evidence supports the Board’s finding . . . .”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Rogers, Millett, Sentelle

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.