Skip to main content
· 5/12/2005

Innoviant Pharmacy, Inc. v. Morganstern

Citations

  • 390 F. Supp. 2d 179
  • 2005 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 29692
  • 2005 WL 1200236

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • finding New York’s greater interest in having its tort law apply to unfair competition and trade secret misappropriation claims “given New York’s status as the forum state in this matter”
  • confidentiality provision in an agreement stating that serious irreparable harm would flow from its breach buttresses a conclusion of irreparable injury

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Peebles

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.