Innovate, Inc. v. United Parcel Service, Inc.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• prejudice in having to proceed to trial where summary judgment otherwise would be entered based on issues deemed admitted
• defendant properly relied on unanswered requests for admissions of fact filed under Pa.R.C.P. 4014 as a basis for a motion for summary judgment (citations omitted)
• “We have already decided that an unanswered request for admissions is binding upon the party failing to file an answer notwithstanding depositions which contain testimony to the contrary.”
• “wherein the court held that, if the party from whom the admissions were sought fails to respond, by either answering or objecting thereto, within the established time frame, that party runs the risk of having those facts deemed admitted”
• “A party on whom requests for admissions of fact are served runs the risk that the facts as set forth in the request for admissions will be conclusively binding on him if he chooses not to file an answer to the request for admissions or file objections to the request.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).