Innophos, Inc. v. RHODIA, SA

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• finding that a contract’s definition of taxes was “sufficiently broad” to encompass water charges, which were not explicitly included in the clause
• rejecting the defendants’ argument that the water fees were not indemnifiable because they were not in the nature of taxes

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).