Innis, Speiden & Co. v. Food Machinery Corp.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• finding no plain error with the trial court's imprecise explanation of death penalty aggravating and mitigating factors at voir dire
• summarily rejecting argument that trial court erred by denying motion for 12 peremptory challenges
• summarily rejecting argument that trial court erred by denying motion for 12 peremptory challenges
• intent to kill may be deduced from the instrument used to produce death, its tendency to destroy life, and the manner of inflicting a fatal wound
• person told jurors outside courtroom two or three times that “ ‘nothing short of the death penalty would be satisfactory’ ”; no prejudice was shown, as remark was momentary, was that person’s personal opinion, and jurors said they would not be affected and would be impartial
• “the complaining party must show actual prejudice.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).