Innes v. Kansas (In Re Innes)

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• “[T]he bankruptcy court correctly considered all of [the non- debtor spouse’s] disposable income and applied the proportionate share of her income to the family’s essential or basic living expenses. To require her to do more would essentially force her (or her children

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).