Inmuno Vital, Inc. v. Golden Sun, Inc.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• finding Lanham Act claim was not barred by allegedly illegal curative claims because no evidence established claims were false and because \cancer cure” was collateral to trademark at issue \Vida Vital”
• finding use of a trademark de minimis where, in over two years, a vitamin company sold 20 units in Illinois, 16 in New Jersey, 124 in Florida, and 648 in Texas, but finding that selling 1,564 units in Puerto Rico and 12,351 in California was sufficient
• “[T]o prevail on its [common law trademark infringement claim], Golden Sun must have obtained trade rights in the mark prior to Inmuno Vital's first use.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).