Inman v. Whitehouse, 2001-1256, (r.I. 2002)

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• explaining that “the party seeking removal . . . bears the burden of establishing federal jurisdiction”
• noting that we accepted the appeal to resolve an unsettled CAFA removal question
• reaching the same conclusion and stating that “[t]he only two circuits that have squarely addressed this issue agree with us”
• describing “inefficient splintering” of cases into parallel class actions as “the worst of both worlds”
• “As the party seeking removal, Home Depot bears the burden of establishing federal jurisdiction.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).