Skip to main content
· 4/20/1955

Inman v. Brice Realty Co.

Citations

  • 204 Or. 215
  • 282 P.2d 657
  • 1955 Ore. LEXIS 276

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • finding that an employer perceived the risk of violating federal law where that employer merely knew of an anti-discrimination poster in the workplace
  • denying summary judgment where plaintiff was “subjected, on a daily basis, to verbal assaults of the most vulgar and humiliating sort”
  • overturning judgment as a matter of law after concluding that \barrage\ of sexual comments directed at plaintiff on \daily basis\ (including a threat to rape her) was \unquestionably sufficient\ to create a jury question as to whether the conduct was actionably severe or pervasive
  • overturning judgment as a matter of law after concluding that “barrage” of sexual comments directed at plaintiff on “daily basis” (including a threat to rape her) was “unquestionably sufficient” to create a jury question as to whether the conduct was actionably severe or pervasive
  • “Anderson was subjected, on a daily basis, to verbal assaults of the most vulgar and humiliating sort.”
  • punitive damages available when an employer “has discriminated in the face of a known risk that his conduct will violate federal law”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Brand, Lusk, Tooze, Warner

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.