Inland Steel Corp. v. Consolidated Rail Corp.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• avoidance of lien under § 522(f)(2) violative of the “taking” clause of U.S.Constit. amend. V,
• existence of gap means retroactive intent must be inferred
• existence of gap means retroactive intent must be inferred
• Section 522(f)(2) applies to pre-enactment security interests
• Section 522(f)(2) applies to pre-enactment security interests

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).