Skip to main content
· 7/24/1941

Inland Development Co. v. Sherman

Citations

  • 121 F.2d 856
  • 1941 U.S. App. LEXIS 3340

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • “A withheld reference may be highly material when it discloses a more complete combination of relevant features, even if those features are before the patent examiner in other references.” (citations omitted)
  • approving of distinctness requirement in dicta

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Phillips, Symes

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.