Inko-Tariah v. Bowser

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• concluding that the Final Rule is legislative in character rather than interpretative and thus has the force of law
• explaining that when evaluating the public interest factor, “[t]he government’s and the public’s interests merge when the government is a party”
• describing the National Firearm Act’s transfer tax as “explicitly intended to tax these weapons out of existence”
• maintaining motions panel’s preliminary injunction pending appeal while district court reconsidered the preliminary injunction factors on remand
• reversing district court’s denial of preliminary injunction against implementation of the Final Rule
• discussing the sliding scale used to evaluate the preliminary injunction requirements

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).